Igor still isn't a strong enough reader to move onto chapter books. He's exactly on target for his reading skills, but still not quite advanced enough for it not to be hard work. One of the
My job at the library basically entails processing the new books and DVD's that are received. I do all the stamping, stickering and enter them into the catalog for circulation. Lots of piddley details but not the most taxing job. What amazes me are the popularity of some writers over others. James Patterson books inevitably have hold list of 50 or 60 people, as well as several other popular writers. The most popular books - the ones we purchase 7 or more copies of - are by writers I find so formulaic that if you've read two of their books you can pretty much figure out the plot in their other books. I get that sometimes one just read fluff for entertainment, but the books that hit me as modern literature have pretty low circulation. I also wonder if people realize that these overly prolific writers are not really writing their own books. James Patterson seems to release a new book every month with a co-writer no one has ever heard of. ( I pick on him because he is very obvious - there are other writers just as guilty) I think I have an ethical problem with this. To put one's name on a book you obviously could not have written - because you have written 22 other books this year - just seems so wrong and smells of plagiarism. The authors that "co-write" must get a lot out this, money or at least publishing deals under their own pen to make it worth it. I'd be damned it I wrote a novel and then let James Patterson or any other author put his/her name on it.
Off of my soapbox now.
1 comment:
oh, there are a few authors that I can't stand....but they have HUGE followings. I love a new book, by a new author...something different. I really hate it when you can figure out a book in the first chapter. Grrrrr....
Post a Comment